BEFORE
THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI
O.A.
NO. __________ of 20__
IN THE MATTER OF:
---------------- …APPLICANT
VERSUS
--------------- …RESPONDENT
I N D E X
S.No. |
Particulars |
Page No. |
|
Compilation I |
|
1 |
Synopsis & List of Dates |
|
2 |
Original Application |
|
3 |
Annexure
– A1: |
|
|
COMPILATION
II |
|
4 |
Annexure
– A2: The copy of
appointment letter |
|
5 |
Annexure
– A3: |
|
6 |
Annexure
– A4: The copy of the
application form |
|
7. |
Annexure
– A/5 colly.: The copy of the emails made by the applicant |
|
8. |
Annexure A/6 : |
|
9. |
Annexure –A7 The copy of the RTI reply |
|
10. |
Annexure –A8 |
|
11. |
Annexure –A9 The copy of the detailed representation dated----- to the respondent |
|
12. |
Annexure –A10 The copy of the reply dated ----- by the respondent |
|
13. |
Vakalatnama |
|
FILED
BY:
DATE:
ADVOCATE FOR THE APPLICANT
Synopsis
& List of Dates
The applicant is
aggrieved by denial -------- on the basis of an illegal, arbitrary and
unreasoned action of the respondent.
The applicant is meritorious and
hardworking appointed to the post --------------- and
therefore had completed the-------. It is humbly submitted that---------------. The respondent had invited applications to the post of ---------------------.
It is submitted that the Circular ------------ dated
----------was issued in respect of vacancies for the post
of-------------. The last date was extended from time to
time to give ample opportunity to all the eligible candidates to apply.
The applicant being eligible in
all respect initiated the process to apply for the--------. While furnishing
his details, applicant found---------------. Therefore, the applicant requested the
respondent ----------------to the applicant so that he could apply for
-------------. However, --------- was not made available to the applicant------------.
The
respondent issued the impugned ------------and the said list did not include
the applicant. It is pertinent to state that the
respondents had chosen not to fill all the vacancies of the-------------, and
left some posts vacant for want of eligible candidates.
It was specifically replied by the respondents that the applicant was not
considered as applicant had----------. Hence, the only reason for not
considering the application of the applicant was non availability--------------.
It is submitted that the respondents were having all the resources and
information ---------------and the failure of the respondent cannot impede the
prospects of the applicant.
It is submitted
that the denial of ----------- applicant on the whimsical ground of--------------,
despite him being eligible in all respect in terms of the recruitment rules, is
arbitrary and illegal. Hence, the present Application.
LIST OF DATES
----------- |
The applicant was ---------- |
----------- |
The respondent vide Circular No. --------invited applications of the
eligible candidates |
__________ |
Applicant being eligible duly
submitted the required credentials |
--------- |
The applicant requested the
respondents through various email representations |
------------ |
The applicant also made a detailed representation dated -------to the
respondent. The reply obtained thereof stated that the the applicant was not
considered due to----------. |
--------- |
Hence, the
present application. |
BEFORE THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI
O.A.
NO.____________of 2022
IN THE MATTER OF:
1.
------------
S/O ---------
R/O
--------- ….APPLICANT
VERSUS
2. …RESPONDENT
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION
19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT, 1985 ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT.
1.
Particulars of the orders against which the application is
made:
The applicant is aggrieved by the
discriminatory, arbitrary and illegal act of the respondents-------------, for
the vacancy despite the applicant being eligible in all respect. The Copy of the impugned --------------is annexed
herewith as Annexure A/1.
2.
Jurisdiction of the Tribunal:
That the applicants declare that the subject matter
against which they seek redressal is within the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble
Tribunal.
3.
Limitation:
That the applicant declare that the application is
within the limitation period prescribed in Section 21 of the Administrative
Tribunal Act, 1985. The cause of action has arisen on -------- when the
impugned order has been issued without considering the eligibility of the
applicant.
4.1
That the applicant was appointed to the post of---------------.
The copy of appointment order dated ---------is enclosed herewith as Annexure A/2.
4.2
That
the respondent vide Circular No. ----------invited
applications of the eligible candidates ---------The said time period was extended
by subsequent circulars. The Copy of -----------is enclosed herewith as Annexure A/3 (Colly).
4.3
That
the Applicant being eligible w.e.f. cut off date -----------duly submitted the
required credentials ------to the respondents vide application no.
_________dated _______________. The copy of the application form is annexed
herewith as Annexure A/4.
4.4
That
the application form for ---------- to the post of----------. However, the
applicant did not possessed the ------------at the time of making of aforesaid
application.
4.5
Therefore, the applicant requested the
respondents through various email representations to provide ----------- of the
applicant.The copy of the------- made by the applicant are annexed herewith as Annexure A/5(Colly).
4.6
That
the respondent failed to pay any heed to the multiple requests of the applicant
for the demand------------.
4.7
However, the respondents were having all the
resources and information about all the candidates and it was the duty of the
respondents.
4.8
It is pertinent to state that the respondents
had chosen not to----------------. Thus the respondent’s unreasoned action
impeded the future prospects of the applicant. The copy of the RTI application
of the applicant is enclosed herewith as Annexure
A/7.
4.9
That the respondent in pursuance of the another
RTI application filed by the applicant sent a reply to the applicant vide ---------
wherein it stated that the application of the applicant to the post of -----------.
4.10 That the
applicant also made a detailed representation dated -------- to the respondent.
The copy of the detailed representation ------ to the respondent is enclosed
herewith as Annexure A/9. The copy
of the reply dated ----- by the respondent is enclosed herewith as Annexure A/10.
5. Grounds
for Relief with Legal Provisions:
5.1
Because
the action of respondents of not considering the applicant --------------
is arbitrary, illegal and unreasonable.
5.2
Because the applicant ------- since there were ----
vacant ------------ on the said date and the applicant-------.
5.3
Because the respondents for reason best
known to them had chosen not to fill all the vacancies of the post, and left
some posts vacant for want of eligible candidates.
5.4
Because the respondents were having
all the resources and information about all the candidates and it was the
necessary precondition on part of the respondents to verify the details.
5.5
Because the respondent arbitrary and illogical
conduct has caused severe damage to the future prospects of the applicant
by denying him his right.
5.6
Because
the respondents have taken a hyper technical view of the matter. Further, the
applicant possessed the requisite eligibility qualifications at the relevant time.
5.7
Because
the denial of the ---------- to the applicant has to be governed by good reason
and rationality. It is not a whimsical or arbitrary power that the executive is
vested with. The valid reasons should exist and also the accountability on part
of respondents for its delay.
5.8
Because
the applicant have been denied a legitimate right to be considered to the post.
The applicant have a prima-facie good case on merit but was not allowed appointment
due to lapse on part of the respondent.
5.9
Because
the applicant should not be allowed to suffer on account of a lapse on part of
the respondents.
5.10 Because the impugned action is
violative of the fundamental rights of the applicant enshrined in Articles 14,
16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
6. Details of the remedies exhausted:
The Applicant declare that he
has availed all the possible remedies available to them under the relevant
service rules.
7. Matter not
previous filed or pending with any other Court/Bench of the Tribunal:
The Applicant
further declare that they have not filed any Petition/Application on the
subject matter of the O.A. before this Hon’ble Tribunal or any other
Court/Tribunal.
8. Relief Sought:
It is, therefore, most respectfully
prayed that this Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to:
(i)
To declare that the applicant is entitled to the--------.
(ii)
To declare that the act of the respondent
in not granting ---------- as illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable.
(iii)
Pass
any such orders as the Court may deem fit in the light of above-mentioned facts
and circumstances of the case.
9. Interim Relief, if any, prayed for:
In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Hon’ble Tribunal may
kindly be pleased to direct the respondent ____________.
10. The Application
has been filed through Counsel.
11. Details of
the Postal Order in respect of the Application Fee:
(i) Number
of the Indian Postal Order: ___________
(ii)
Name
of the Issuing Post Office: ____________
(iii)
Date
of Issue of Postal Order: ____________
(iv)
Post
Office at which payable: New
Delhi.
1. Enclosures:
(As per index)
BEFORE THE CENTRAL
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI
O.A. NO. __________ of 20__
IN THE MATTER OF:
---------------- …APPLICANT
VERSUS
--------------- …RESPONDENT
AFFIDAVIT
I, --------------S/o
-----------aged about ------- R/o--------,
do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under :-
1.
That I am the Applicant no.1 in the present O.A. and am well
versed with the facts and circumstances of the case and hence competent to
swear this affidavit.
2.
That the accompanying application has been drafted by my
counsels on my instruction, and its contents have been read over to me in
vernacular and the same are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
are not being repeated herein for the sake of brevity
.
3.
That the contents of the application may kindly be read as
part and parcel of this affidavit.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified at
----- on this ____ day of -------, that the contents of the above affidavit are
true and correct to the best of my knowledge and nothing material has been
concealed therefrom.
DEPONENT