Securing Lawful Access to a Deceased Person’s Bank Locker: Why Letters of Administration, Not a Succession Certificate, Is the Correct Legal Remedy

Securing Lawful Access to a Deceased Person’s Bank Locker: Why Letters of Administration, Not a Succession Certificate, Is the Correct Legal Remedy

When an individual passes away leaving behind a bank locker, family members are often confronted with the practical and legal challenge of gaining access to it. A widespread but mistaken belief is that a Succession Certificate issued under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is sufficient to access and operate such a locker. However, settled legal principles and binding judicial precedents clarify that this is not the case. In particular, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court’s authoritative decision in CM(M) 934/2017 draws a clear distinction between debts and securities—which fall under the scope of a Succession Certificate—and bank lockers, which do not.

Limitations of a Succession Certificate

The legal purpose of a Succession Certificate is narrowly defined. Under Section 370 of the Indian Succession Act, it is intended solely to enable the collection of debts and securities owed to the deceased. In its judgment in CM(M) 934/2017, the Delhi High Court unequivocally held that such a certificate merely authorizes the grantee to collect monetary dues and securities from third parties, and does not confer any title or right to possess or deal with the movable or immovable assets of the deceased.

Moreover, the Court observed that even in cases involving factual or legal complexity—where summary adjudication is not appropriate—a Succession Certificate may still be granted under Section 373(3), but only after a prima facie determination of the applicant's entitlement. Importantly, this is always conditional upon the furnishing of an indemnity bond under Section 375. Crucially, the Court made it clear that a bank locker is not covered within the scope of a Succession Certificate.

Letters of Administration: The Appropriate Legal Remedy

In light of this judicial pronouncement, the proper legal route for gaining access to a deceased person’s bank locker is to file a petition for Letters of Administration under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The Delhi High Court expressed concern over the routine error of filing for a Succession Certificate when Letters of Administration are legally warranted—an error that often leads to unnecessary procedural complications and avoidable delay.

A grant of Letters of Administration empowers the petitioner to take charge of the entire estate of the deceased, including movable properties such as the contents of a bank locker. This remedy is particularly applicable in the following circumstances:

  • When the deceased died intestate (without leaving a will);
  • When a will exists but no executor is named therein; or
  • When the appointed executor is unwilling or unable to act.

Recommended Legal Course of Action

For individuals seeking lawful access to a deceased person’s bank locker, the following legal steps are advisable:

1.  File a petition for Letters of Administration under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act before the competent District Court.

2.    Obtain the grant of Letters of Administration through judicial proceedings.

3.  Present the Letters to the concerned bank, along with any other compliance documents.

4.    Seek access to the bank locker and its contents in accordance with law.

In summary, relying on a Succession Certificate to access a deceased person’s bank locker is both procedurally incorrect and legally unsustainable. A bank locker is not a debt or security and, therefore, falls outside the jurisdiction of Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act. The correct remedy lies in obtaining Letters of Administration, which provide the legal authority to collect and manage the deceased’s assets—including locker contents.

Opting for the appropriate legal route not only ensures compliance with judicial interpretation but also avoids unnecessary delays, procedural setbacks, and the risk of rejection by the banks.